Why not work from the street without working from the office or home?

Some companies want people to go back to their desks. Others work from their kitchen tables and are fine with them. How 2022!

But why not let SpaceX work with Starlink from the side of the road pulling their RV?

I have friends who do not work from their office or home.

They work from where they find themselves. In fact, you know one of them. Computerworld’s own Mike Elgan has been a digital nomad for years. He is working near Venice, Italy.

Me? I’m a homebody that usually works from home, but I’m working from Madrid this week.

But, it is not easy.

Get internet connection. Even more than energy – that’s why batteries – we need the internet to work

As the Mobile Internet Research Center points out: “There is no single ‘best solution’ for all mobile Internet situations. If you want to move locations fairly or need to be, you need to be prepared for the reality that everything that works best will change. Time. “

They are right. It changes every time.

I use Verizon when I’m in the US for 4G / 5G internet as my last resort. But when I’m in Europe, I switch to my Google Fi. The Fi service is much cheaper and has better coverage for international calls and the Internet

How many people want to pay for two phone services?

But, if you get a high-speed internet connection that will work for you wherever you go – say, something you can add to your RV or boat?

It is no longer a fantasy. SpaceX’s Starlink is now available as a Starlink for RV.

With this, across the continental United States, most parts of Canada, and across the UK and a large part of Europe, you can now get StarLink download speeds in excess of 100Mbps, upload speeds in the 12Mbps range, and latency of around 20 milliseconds.

It’s fast enough for work and video conferencing.

Out of curiosity, Starlink says you can sign up and pick up a dish for your RV or boat right now. Meanwhile, I am still on the waiting list and will not receive any food until mid-2022. Come on, Elon! Let’s get this dish on my roof!

Before you take out your credit card, there are several items in FAQ Fine Print that you must consider.

First, you only get Starlink’s “best effort service”.

As Starlink explains for RVs FAQ: “Network resources for Starlink for RVs users are always unprecedented compared to other Starlink services, resulting in service degradation and reduced speed in congested areas and peak hours. The worst delays will be in the ‘waitlist’ area on the Starlink availability map during peak hours. “

I don’t like the sound of it, but it’s still better than many options.

In my case, Verizon covers most of the places I visit in the state. “Mostly.” Starlink promises to take care of me wherever I go, unless I live in a city where skyscrapers block my vision.

It’s not cheap either.

Ordinary Sterlink costs $ 110 per month including a one-time equipment fee of 99 599. The Sterlink business costs $ 500 per month, including a one-time equipment fee of 500 2,500. The mobile version will cost an extra $ 25 per month, so you can expect a final monthly bill of 5 135.

It’s still less than paying for my spectrum gigabit cable connection which I can’t take anywhere.

And, if you have your RV in your driveway, you can pause the service. You will only pay for the months that you are actually on the road.

Also you can’t put Starlink in a car. Although I must say that the idea of ​​running a Tesla Model S with a Starlink antenna on the roof brings a smile to my face. You really need an RV. Or, if you never plan on carrying something in your pickup truck, I guess you can put one there too.

And, if you have a private jet to make your own calls, Someday soon, you may be able to buy Starlink Jet.

So, is it worth it? I think it’s for some people. If you work and you really like the idea of ​​van life, it sounds good. My partner Mary and I have been playing with the idea of ​​getting a small RV for many years now, and it will make it easier. Stay tuned.

Me and my Starlink connection may soon be in a town near you!

Copyright © 2022 IDG Communications, Inc.

The Macbook receives the NVMe SSD with a BGA-simulated PCB

Recently, we stumbled upon a video by [iBoff], Adding an M.2 NVMe port to a 2011-2013 MacBook. Apple laptops don’t come with the correct M.2 port, especially the A1278 – so what’s up? The strategy is to disassemble a PCIe-connected Thunderbolt controller, then solder a BGA-like interpozor PCB to where the chip was, and then pull a cable assembly to Drive Bay, where a custom adapter PCB is waiting. If you want to connect an external GPU instead of an NVMe SSD, that adapter lets you publish the PCIe link as a full size PCIe 4x slot!

The process is well documented in the video, serving as a guide manual for anyone trying to install this particular mode, but a collection of insights and ideas for anyone interested in imitating it. The interpozor board with the solder ball is reinforced on the ship so that it can be installed like a BGA chip – but the cable assembly connector is not installed in the interposer, since it has to be soldered to the mainboard with hot air, which will then melt the connector. The PCB that replaces the optical drive does not compromise, either, tapping the SATA connector pin and lets you add an additional 2.5mm SATA SSD.

Attaching an NVMe drive is an undeniable way to speed up your old laptop, and since they’re all under the PCIe hood, you can be really creative with the specific way you connect it. You’re not limited to replacing obscure parts like the Thunderbolt controller – given a laptop with a separate GPU and a CPU, you can get rid of the disconnected GPU and replace it with an adapter for one, or even two NVMe. The drive, and all you need is a PCB that has the same footprint as your GPU. Unfortunately, the PCB files for this adapter do not appear to be open-source, but developing a replacement for your own needs would be best started from scratch.

We’ve seen an adapter made for the Raspberry Pi 4 before, a QFN soldable in place of the USB 3.0 controller chip and transmits the PCIe signal to the USB 3 connector pin. However, this one takes it up a notch! Typically, without this type of adapter, if we want to get a PCIe link from a board that is never intended for publication, we need to carefully solder a properly covered cable. What’s happening with PCIe and why is it great? We talked deeply about that!

Top 10 Mac Moments in WWDC History

Google’s open source security measures can be meaningless. In a perfect world, it is

One of the biggest threats to enterprise cybersecurity is redesigned third party code and open source code, so you
I think Google’s sure open source software service will be a big help.

Think again.

Here is Google’s pitch: “Certain OSS Enterprise and public sector users of open source software enable them to easily incorporate the same OSS packages that Google uses in their own developer workflow. Packages collected by the confirmed OSS service are regularly scanned, analyzed, and phage-tested for vulnerabilities; Contains rich metadata including container / artifact analysis data; Made with Cloud Build with verifiable SLSA-compliant proof; Verifiably signed by Google; And distributed from an Artifact Registry, protected and protected by Google. “

This service may or may not be effective depending on the end user. For some companies – especially small and medium-sized businesses – this can be valuable for small operations without a dedicated IT team. But for larger enterprises, things are very different.

Like all things cyber security, we must start with faith. IT Should trust Google’s efforts here? First, we have already approved a number of malware-laden or otherwise problematic apps for the Google App Store, Google Play. (To be fair, it’s just as bad in Apple’s App Store.)

That makes the point. It is extremely difficult to find any security issues with the code. No one is going to do it perfectly, and Google (and Apple) doesn’t have a business model to properly stuff those territories. So they rely on automation, which is spot on.

Don’t get me wrong. That’s the decent thing to do, and it should end there. But the key enterprise IT question is whether this program will allow them to do something different. I argue that it will not.

Every single IT code – especially open source – needs to be scanned for any problems. This may include intentional problems, such as malware, ransomware, backdoor or other malicious things. However, it will also include accidental holes. It is difficult to completely fight against typo or slow coding.

This is not to say that coders / programmers can justify not double-checking the code from this Google program. And no, the knowledge that Google uses it internally should not make any CIO, IT director or CISO feel warm and vague.

This brings with it a big problem: all initiatives Should Check every line of code and double check that they access from somewhere else – no exceptions. That is to say, reality is combined with ideals.

I discussed the Google move with Chris Visopal, one of the founders of software security company Veracode, and he made some mandatory points. There are several disconnections in the issue, one between developer / coder and IT management, the other between IT management (CIO) and security management (CISO).

For the first disconnection, IT may issue as many policy announcements as it wishes. If the field developers choose to ignore these commands, it comes down to enforcement. Every line-of-business executive is breathing down the neck of IT, demanding everything immediately – and those people generate revenue, which means they will probably win any battle with the CFO or CEO – hard to enforce.

It assumes that IT has actually issued instructions that the external code should be double-checked to see if the code is naughty and beautiful. This is the second conflict: CISO, CSO and CRO all want code-checking to happen regularly, while IT directors and CIOs may take a less aggressive stance.

There is a risk from Google’s move, which could be described as a false sense of security. There will be a temptation from some people in IT to use Google’s offer as an opportunity to succumb to the pressure of LOB and to give up cyber security checks on any aspect of Google’s Assured Program. To be blunt, it means deciding to trust the Google team to capture everything completely (and blindly).

I can’t imagine a Fortune 1000 (or their personally-owned counterpart) IT executive believing and acting that way. But if they are pressured to step down quickly from business leaders, it is a relatively mouth-watering excuse to do what they can’t.

This forces us to deal with some uncomfortable situations. Is Google Assured more secure than unchecked code? Absolutely. Would it be perfect? Of course not. Therefore, prudence indicates that what was done before IT should be continued and all code should be checked. This makes Google’s efforts for the enterprise irrelevant.

But it is not so easy and it is never. The viceroy argues that many initiatives do not simply examine what they should do. If this is true – and I sadly admit it is – then Google Assured is an improvement over what we had last month.

In other words, if you’re already cutting corners and planning to continue, Google’s move could be a good thing. This is irrelevant if you are strict about code-testing.

Wysopal further argues that Google’s scale is too small to help much, regardless of an enterprise’s code-checking method. “This project needs to scale 10-fold to make a big difference,” Wysopal said.

What those IT leaders will do No. Strictly check the code? “They wait for someone else to find the weakness (and then fix it). The enterprise is a dumb consumer of open source. If a vulnerability is found by someone else, they want a system where they can update, “said Visopal. As soon as the app starts to slow down security things, it bypasses. “

Google’s move is good news for those who have taken a much safer corner. How many institutions are there? It’s controversial, but I’m afraid Wysopal could be more accurate than anyone would like to admit.

Copyright © 2022 IDG Communications, Inc.

IT workers face more stress from remote problems

IT support has changed forever as more employees are now working from any number of remote locations – and no longer sitting behind a corporate firewall.

The days of taking your computer to the IT department for repairs or dropping help-desk staff by Cubicel to fix your network connection problems have been replaced by the need for support from anywhere on any device.

“Five years ago, [IT workers] It was about how to support things like Windows updates and changes to new hardware every four or five years. It was a cookie cutter, “said Mark Boker, a senior analyst at the research firm Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG).

In the first quarter of this year, ESG conducted a double-blind survey of 200 U.S.-based IT decision makers responsible for helping desk support in their organization. IT help desk teams have reported sustainable levels of stress and burnout, according to ESG reports, which were commissioned by Splashtop, a remote access and support technology vendor.

Overall, 65% of IT helpdesk teams in the United States said they were experiencing stress and burnout, and 94% of organizations said they had experienced great resignation, or challenges in their support activities related to the lack of available talent. For IT shops, these challenges include maintaining support goals and “volatile stress levels that are complicated by increased workload.”

“The challenge in IT is around performance skills; Their responsibility and importance in supporting remote work has greatly increased, “said Boker. “And companies don’t want to increase IT staff. So the question is: is the company investing in IT tools that can help process automation and eliminate routine tasks? “

IDC challenges this graphic IDC

Although most organizations say that remote support was influential even before the COVID-19 epidemic, it is now being viewed as critical. Ninety-nine percent of organizations surveyed by the ESG said that half or more of all help-desk tickets needed “distance support”.

“Any IT role that affects anyone starting from within the IT organization, supporting the help-desk, or dealing with staff, is affected,” Boker said. In addition, 96% of companies say remote support will dominate work pressure for the foreseeable future.

From a holistic technology perspective, many tech workers have taken up remote work, Boker noted, adopting collaborative tools as new norms and using them effectively. “It simply came to our notice then. They were only accustomed to private meetings.

“Of course, with people working from a distance, collaboration and communication are now an essential part of their work,” Bokar continued. “Things like peripheral support; Is the microphone working? Is the camera property installed and is it working with the application? “

Resolving the issue of end-point devices has become a particularly difficult challenge as employees access corporate resources through numerous home and Wi-Fi networks.

“Security and privacy is a whole different matter on its own,” Boker said. “It simply came to our notice then. An organization’s security stance has been challenged with remote work. That’s why [end-point] Device may be unknown – people are using their personal device, they are accessing [corporate servers] From an unknown network. “

Companies must now understand the real-world needs of end users; For users, having vanilla “small, medium and large” end-point configurations – as many companies do – no longer works, according to Fool. Instead, they need to customize the tools suitable for end-user work.

“If you have sales people who spend a lot of time on Zoom, you need to make sure that their environment is very reliable and has high functionality that enables the best customer experience,” Bocker said. “There’s a greater focus on IT tools for capturing that user’s telemetry, and end-points to enhance end-user experience, increase productivity, increase security, and improve communication.”

For more than two years after the epidemic, chronic stress at work has led to higher levels of burnout classified by the World Health Organization as a occupational event – especially for both Millennium and General Z, according to Consultancy Deloitte.

More than four in 10 Gen Zs (46%) and Millennials (45%) surveyed said they were burned because of the intensity and demand of their work environment. This indicates a significant retention problem for employers. In fact, 44% of Gen Zs and 43% of Millennials say many people have recently left their jobs because of the stress of their work, and Gen Zs and Millennials who have changed organizations over the past two years cite burnout as one of the top three factors. To leave their employer.

Nevertheless, one in four millennials and one in five Z do not believe their employer is taking burnout seriously or taking steps to address it, indicating that many companies still do not fully understand – or address – the effect of burnout.

Amy Lumis, a research director at IDC, says there are not enough IT personnel to support the hybrid-work situation scale.

“And those workers themselves need more support in the form of training to keep up with things like the new security protocols, new automated workflows and the pressure to support civic developers over their heads with low- and no-code offers,” Lumis said via email.

The challenge of IT support for remote workers is particularly acute in North America, with 44% of respondents to the IDC survey last year saying it was one of the biggest challenges they faced.

Data from IDC’s survey of nearly 400 technology leaders indicates that IT is much more open to acquiring talent across a variety of sourcing models, such as using “gig” workers, crowd-sourcing, using contract workers, and automating tasks with software tools.

IDC challenges this to Graphic 2 IDC

“We need to think not only about IT support as a resource for hybrid workers, but also about the support we need for IT,” Lumis said. “A lot of IT workers are drowning in service requests that they can’t keep up, new security threat incidents and a wide-ranging threat landscape across endpoints, networks, cloud and application contexts.”

Support for IT must come from additional areas, from additional team members, third-party support staff, training to keep up with new technologies, and automation of repetitive administrative tasks, Lumis said.

As a result, companies need to help IT adapt to the current work dynamics with a support model that extends seamlessly to end users. IT companies that no longer have personal IT support now rely on remote session technology to troubleshoot and resolve issues.

Seven out of 10 respondents to the ESG survey reported that investment support in remote session technology improves key performance indicators and expands the potential talent pool of companies.

In some cases, it’s as simple as making sure IT workers have the right technology. Ensuring that employee experience, employee engagement, and customer experience are high on the priority list is far more important than ever.

The tools available to companies range from simple end-point health check-up tools to specifically measuring remote network bandwidth, CPU usage, and memory, to help remotely monitor and operate remote staff, Boker said.

According to the ESG, most tickets to the help desk are associated with user errors. Therefore, it is essential to have a mechanism and technology to quickly identify, solve and help users learn from their errors. The ability to see directly what an employee is doing enables IT workers to quickly understand the problem and collaborate directly with the person to solve the problem quickly. This enhanced process trains the user in real time, as well as helps to identify other potential problems that may arise.

Companies that have significantly increased funding for remote session solutions are more than twice as likely to rate those solutions as great, according to an IDC survey. Companies that have significantly increased funding for remote session solutions also gain 59% more helpdesk staff throughput.

“I was once one [IT worker], So I think technology workers usually face challenges. They’re a consumer of technology and they understand what it can do, “said Boker. Hybrid workforce. “

Copyright © 2022 IDG Communications, Inc.

Apple’s wage increase is an excellent smoke screen for many ugly fears

Apple headsets will not be unveiled at WWDC after all, analysts agree

Ultra light VORON X-beam assembled from aluminum tube stock

Voron X / Y Carriage Overview.
Voron X / Y Carriage Overview.

When it comes to 3D printing using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology, there are two main groups of printers: Cartesian and CoreXY, the latter being the domain head who want to get the fastest print, much more courtesy of the tool head configuration. Less mass in the X / Y carriage assembly means it can run faster, which leads CoreXY FDM enthusiasts to experiment with carbon fiber, and a recent video [PrimeSenator] Where an X-beam made from aluminum tube stock is shown which weighs less than a comparable carbon fiber tube.

Since the CoreXY FDM printer moves only in the Z-direction relative to the print surface, the X / Y axes are directly controlled by the belt and actuator. This means that the faster and more precisely you can move the extruder head along the linear rail, the faster you can (theoretically) print. Ditching heavy carbon fiber for this milled aluminum structure on a Voron design CoreXY printer should mean less dynamic inertia, preliminary demonstrations show positive results.

The interesting thing about this ‘Speed ​​Printing’ community is that CoreXY FDM printers are theoretically superior in terms of accuracy (resolution) and efficiency (such as build volume). These are just some of the goal setting shareware that you can use when purchasing FDM-style printers.

AnyMP4 can capture anything playing on your computer screen

Can you make an industry grade CNC with only DIY resources?

[FloweringElbow] Aka [Bongo] It’s definitely getting noticed on YouTube, and we think he’s a winner! This epic flatbed CNC build (video, embedded below) begins with a few second hand structural eye-beams, welded-on eye-beam legs, DIY cast aluminum side plates and lots of concrete to give a strong and, importantly, heavy structure.

The ideal machine is to reduce the vibrations caused by cutting as hard and heavy, high-feed speeds as possible, or to dampen the forces caused by cutting hard components, so large is really good. For frame construction, the steel is quite strong, and the mass of the structure makes it extra damp, but triangulation was required to prevent additional twisting. He sewed the pre-heated frame into inch-long sections to limit the heat transferred to the metal, lowering the next battle sheet. [Bongo] Hacky Vibratory Stress Relief (VSR), built from a washing machine motor and odd weight, has been used, including feedback from a mobile phone app to find the resonance frequency, framed. There are other videos in the channel dedicated to such stress relief strategies.

Preferably enough to cut sticky-backed vinyl in half!

When it came time to add more mass, a priming coat was made from a mixture of bonding epoxy and sharp grit, which was made on a non-slip floor. The concrete mix uses Portland cement, pozzolan (silica fume) polycarbonate superplasticizer and 1/2 ″ glass fiber thread. A second mixture was added crushed stone for extra mass. A neat technique was to make a handheld vibratory compactor from a plate welded to the end of an old drill bit mounted on an SDS hammer drill.

Once the frame is properly inverted (breaking the overloaded lift in the process) the upper surface needs to be leveled to receive the linear rails. This was done using a super current, self-leveling epoxy and tested by the water flowing over it. Once the epoxy surfaces were sufficiently flattened and coupled (and much later scraped) the linear rails were attached, after making some epoxy shoulders to butt up against them. The last plates were bolted to the frame to attach the lead screws on the Y axis with a grit-loaded epoxy bond in the middle.

The gantry design was omitted for this video (but you can see it here) and a quick test once mounted showed that the machine was working. An intriguing task is to make their own cable-chain from plywood on the machine, instead of buying something peg-of-the-peg expensive. Why not? Once the machine was working well enough to match a flat sheet of steel to a nice reflective surface, it was used to cut some vinyl shapes to mount a DIY drag-knife, so it has accuracy. We’d love to see an XBox controller used to manually jog around the machine! There is so much to see in this build and other related videos, we think it’s worth watching this channel!

We’ve featured CNC builds a lot of the time, there’s a build whatever your needs and budget, but here’s a good starting point for building a machine, good enough to build the tools you need. If you do not have the source of the structural eye-beam in your hand, you can do something quite capable with the help of wood, and if you want to do 3D printing on the knee, we have also covered it.