We humans are in a trance because we put too much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and cause climate change that could even wipe us out. There may still be some people for whom this is a controversial statement, but knowing that something needs to be done about it should be a position where you don’t have to be a climate change worker to lock yourself in the door of a refinery.
It is clear that we can reduce our CO2 emissions to deal with the problem, but it is not the only way to reduce atmospheric CO2. How about removing it from the air? This is a method that is being taken seriously enough to offer several industrial carbon capture solutions and even to build a pilot plant in Iceland. The most promising idea is that CO2 from the power station can be injected into porous basalt rock where it can react to form calcium carbonate. All of which are very impressive, but there is no way to achieve this without resorting to too much technology? It’s time to take out the envelope calculator for Hackade and take a look.
With so much CO2 in the air, is it possible to remove it?
First, whether the scale of the problem is measured or the futility of trying to deal with it, it is worth measuring how much CO2 we release. There are several slightly different figures depending on where you are prepared to look, but most of them agree that people are responsible for over 40 billion tons of CO2 per year. On a per capita basis, Americans account for 15.52 tons each, Canadians 18.58 tons each, and on the Atlantic side where this is being written, the British account for 5.5 tons each. It is worth repeating these figures to show the futility of imagining that some carbon capture plants can scrub the air of CO2 and make a significant difference, because the sheer scale of the problem is such that even the most extensive industrial expansion will find it. It’s hard to keep up.
The first and most obvious way to capture and store large amounts of carbon in non-industrial ways is of course in the form of biomass. The growing trees that become perennial forests seem attractive and quite easy to do, but how realistic is it to make a hole in this emission? According to a National Geographic report of an ETH Zurich survey published in 2019, the size of the newly forested United States could reduce atmospheric CO2 by 25% in 100 years, which makes for a great sound, but it rarely seems like planting a USA-sized land there. Ready for If there is a global desire for planting, it can be an achievable goal, but it is difficult to imagine such a movement in such an ambitious project until the waters of the Chesapeake Bay come to the forefront without the lip service from politicians. White House. It is clear that forests will play a role in tackling our CO2 problem, they cannot solve it alone.
Another intriguing idea came to us through a study by the University of Sheffield, which suggested that the UK could reach 45% of its net-zero emissions target through so-called accelerated weather. CO2 is naturally absorbed by rocks because they are covered by the weakly acidic effect of CO2 dissolved in rainwater, and this concept suggests farmers to extend this effect by applying crushed rock as a soil dressing.
This is an on-the-surface take on the concept of basalt injection, where a large surface area of rock releases much more CO2 from the air as the weather progresses. CO2 is locked in this way, which offsets the emissions. Basalt rock paper is simple enough to make it realistic, but they acknowledge that the scale of the operation will need to be handled with care. Are we ready to lose a whole mountain of rocks in the face of climate change? Maybe not yet, but still again the waters of the Thames estuary can sharpen the attention wandering around 10 Downing Street.
It is clear that there is no magic solution to climate change that will allow us to continue to emit CO2 as if nothing is wrong. There is no super-forest that we can plant, no clever factory that we can build, and no magic soil dressing that will clear the air. However, what emerges from reading these technologies is that they can play a role in offsetting a portion of each emission and, in addition to a meaningful effort to reduce emissions in the first place, help us achieve our coveted net zero. The question is, do we have the public and political will to do this?
Google’s annual I / O Developers Conference will begin on Wednesday, and we’re sure you’ll see all sorts of exciting new things across the entire suite of Google services.
There’s a little secret here, though: you don’t There is Wait until you find something new and useful. Google’s game-changing additions to its apps and products roll out almost constantly, year-round. Most goodies look amazingly pompous and end up being random.
That’s why today, as we sit patiently and twist our toes together before Google’s big ‘Hankin’ announcement, I would like to draw your attention to the remarkable addition to the multifaceted dusty Google Docs domain. These new features have quietly entered the software over the last few weeks, but most people just won’t have a clue.
And my goodness, I tell you: if you work with other people and / or Platip, these options will send a serious dose of extra efficiency into your workflow. They will turn your general-standard document editor into an intelligent canvas for collaboration. And they are already in your existing Docs setup and are just waiting to be discovered
Ready to upgrade your productivity?
(A quick note: all of these items can currently be launched only through the Docs desktop website – but once you set up ‘these’ and add ‘these’ to any document, they will be visible and functional from the Docs app on Android or any other platform .)
1. Docs-Calendar collaboration connection
If you rely on Google Workspace for your workplace thinking, you probably know the joy of meeting on your calendar with isolated notes and checklists. Does the phrase “Hang on, let me find my notes on this” ring a bell?
Okay, notice, you’re a pretty little animal: at some point in the distant past, Google Docs got a clever new tool that could organize your calendar-linked meetings more than ever. It’s a built-in meeting note system that’s in Docs and is associated with a specific event in your Google Calendar so it’s always in a logical place and very easy to access.
To try it for yourself, just fire up a new Google Docs document and type 7 A Symbols anywhere on the body of the document. This will bring up Docs’ helpful new shortcut system, and you’ll probably see the “Meeting Notes” option as one of the top suggestions under the “Building Block” section. If you don’t, just start typing words CommentsAnd it’ll pop up anytime.
Next, Docs will ask you to select an event from your calendar to attach your fancy new notes. It will show you upcoming events as one-click suggestions, or you can search through your agenda right there and then to find the event you want.
Once you’ve selected your event, you’ll be ready to insert and fill a chic small preformatted note template into your document:
You can hover your mouse over any gray-highlighted text in the template to see more information about the date, event, or contact in question. And don’t forget to look for the prompt on the right side of the screen that suggests attaching your notes to the event itself. This will link your current document to an actual event in Google Calendar and create it so that anyone invited (and those with whom the document is shared) can click and view notes from the calendar entry.
Not bad, is it? And as an added bonus, keep in mind that you can now start Google Meet Meetings from Docs on the desktop: just click the new camera-shaped icon in the upper-right corner of the document editing screen – the share button directly to the left of the blue. Your call will then start with a sleek new Docs sidebar so you can view your notes and optionally collaborate with other people even on the call.
2. Docs-Gmail email drafting system
Gmail sure doesn’t make it easy to work with a peer in an email, does it?
I’ve got good news for you though: Google may not be adding a simple collaboration system to Gmail yet, but it There is Has given us an easy way to hammer messages with other people’s input It’s up to you to figure it out.
And the answer, as you might guess, is right inside Google Docs – where it is now possible to create a shared email draft, work with other people in your organization, and / or sea creatures, and then beam it. In your inbox for instant sending.
The trick, once again, is tapping into that new Docs @ menu. Write A In any document in Docs on your desktop, and this time, select “Draft Email” from the menu that appears.
It will bring an interactive Gmail composing tool to your document so it can work on emails that look like your suspiciously smelling fingerprints. And if you want someone else to keep an eye on it and work on it, all you have to do is share the document with them – just like you usually do (screen with that big blue share button at the top-right).
When your email is ready to roll, all you have to do is click the blue Gmail icon in the corner of the area to send the email to Gmail as a draft – where you can see it one more time and then send it with one more click. .
And you don’t have to stop there …
3. Docs Status Tracker
If you Really Want to be wild with the crafting of your Google Docs collaboration, the recently added instant table option is the perfect finishing touches to your productivity pie.
This allows you to insert interactive status tracking toggles into any document – making it easy for you, Pie Ways to keep tabs on progress with Gmail drafts in your meeting note items or documents. (Anyone else suddenly upset for flaky pastry?)
To add it to any document you cook, just hit that easy A Give one more command from anywhere in the document – and this time, type Dropdown And then select “New Dropdown” and then select “Project Status” or “Review Status”.
This will give you a nifty little status tracking indicator that you can place anywhere meaningful – on top of a specific item on your meeting agenda, for example, or on top of that brilliant Gmail draft you dream of in Docs. Anyone with access to edit documents will then be able to toggle clicks to change its status and allow everyone else to keep up with their progress.
If you want to get things right from there, Docs has a more advanced tracking template available in the same @-menu – with a multiperson “review tracker” that allows you Multiple Colleagues look at certain types of content and keep an eye on the status of their review.
You may still want to rely on ideas and other advanced note-taking apps for more complex organization, but with a combination of these new ‘n’ Jesti features, Docs will become a more contemporary and integrated part of your productivity toolkit – and if you use the Google Workspace suite as closely as I can. Relying on O’s services, it can do one The world The difference in your ability to get things done.
Want more Googley knowledge? Sign up for my weekly newsletter Get three delicious new tips in your inbox every Friday – and three bonus tips on your favorite things this second!
Finishing 3D printing is a labor-intensive process, and it takes a lot of time and a lot of practice to get a beautiful, smooth surface suitable for painting. Deep printing layer lines or small surface defects can be smoothed with a variety of materials from putty to resin, but the deeper the defect, the denser the filler will be and this will affect the surface details – smoothing them out and creating fine details is less distinctive. [Darkwing dad] There is another solution that is quite easy to achieve, by mixing acetone with glazing putty it can be airbrushed at once on the printing surface. After a little experimentation with the ratio of putty and acetone, a wide open nozzle and a low pressure, it was found that a beautiful even spray can be achieved. Importantly it dries in just a few minutes, enabling you to apply multiple coats in a short amount of time.
Once sufficient thickness has been applied, the coating can be easily sanded to obtain a smooth result and fill in the worst gaps and the layer lines are neatly concealed. The final part of the filling process is more simple, a few coats of filler primer are applied directly from a rattle can, then there is a light sand and you are good for painting.
We cover smooth 3D prints as long as we cover 3D printing itself, and there are multiple ways to do this, depending on the filament material, your budget, and your tolerance for harmful fumes. Here’s a guide to smoothing using UV curable resin, using a special smooth filament with IPA, and finally if it’s too fancy, smelly or expensive, take out the old butane torch and burn those prints with good old fashioned fire. Smooth 6
Video calls have grown in popularity during the COVID-19 epidemic because of the need for new ways to connect staff to office closures. But for all its conveniences, video conferencing apps also have their downsides – and it’s not just zoom-in fatigue after several back-to-back meetings.
A recent study published in the journal, “Virtual communication hinders the creation of creative ideas” Nature It has been observed that creativity takes a hit when people work collaboratively through video. This is obviously because video conferencing limits a person’s focus to the computer screen, effectively filtering out the rest of the physical space that people occupy. This narrowness of vision also serves to limit cognitive focus, stifling creative thinking that causes people’s eyes to wander when talking privately with others.
But don’t dump video apps yet (or cancel remote work). Melanie Brooks, an assistant professor of marketing at Columbia Business School, who wrote the report with Jonathan Levav, a professor of marketing at Stanford Graduate School of Business, warned against interpreting the results to avoid video conferencing. Instead, the study shows that tools like Zoom are more suitable for specific tasks, especially those that require more intended focus. And for that matter, research suggests that video calls may actually be better for selecting ideas than meeting them in person.
Below is a lightly edited transcript of a “computerworld” conversation with Brooks about the study.
What are the limitations of the study in terms of creativity and conceptualization when collaborating in practice? “We were initially attracted to this research question because we heard from directors and executives – before COVID – that they had problems with innovation with remote teams.
“I was a bit skeptical, because I’ve seen previous research into different types of communication technologies, and it seems that zoom and other video conferencing technologies have solved most of the problems; we can see people’s faces, we can hear what they are.” Again, it’s all synchronous. Unlike phones, where you can’t see people’s faces, or emails where it’s not synchronous, most of what we do in video mimics ‘personally’ very well.
“We keep hearing that people are having problems, though, so we decided to test it: is it true that when we’re in a zoom or video conferencing call, it’s harder to innovate than it is personally?”
“We saw two different phases of innovation; the concept-generation phase – coming up with new ideas – and then the concept-evaluation phase, where you decide which ideas are the most creative and are committed to creating and moving forward.
“What we’ve got is interesting. First of all, one of the most important effects is that the zoom is not ‘worse.’
“We find that it is uniquely bad for creating ideas. People who are actually communicating have created less ideas and created less creative ideas than those who have interacted personally. But when it comes to the next stage, evaluating ideas, we see that there is There is no significant difference between the two terms.In fact, if anything, the virtual groups are a little better at evaluating their ideas.
“It simply came to our notice then.
What were some of the reasons for the negative impact on the idea generation? “We were thinking about the way video conferencing is the same personally [communication] That we had to step back and think, ‘What are the main differences that still exist?’
The idea came from my own observations. When I was working on research with colleagues, either in person or on video, I realized that video calls are much more effective; It was much more ‘on-task’ – there was an agenda that we stuck with. When we interacted personally, there seemed to be a lot more non-security and opportunities to explore different ways. And so we thought, why? Why can this difference be how we communicate? And we understand that [one of] The main difference that still exists is the difference in physicality.
“When we interact personally, we have the whole room as our shared environment. And the only way I can truly get out of the shared environment is if I get up and leave. Otherwise, wherever I look, no matter what. Yes, I’m still in this shared environment with another person.
“But when you’re communicating in video, you only have the screen as your shared environment. And when people obscure their backgrounds, you literally have their faces. The only thing you have to share with that person. We thought how. This can eventually force people to shrink their visual focus to the screen.
“There is research that shows that visual attention and cognitive arousal are very closely linked. The more you focus, the more likely you are to focus cognitively. ‘Focused.’ And it turns out it’s bad for creativity. You don’t want to focus, you want to be broad and you want to be investigative, you want to go those different ways and those who are non-sequestered. “
How important was the negative impact on creativity between the two modes? “We’ve seen the number of creative ideas generated, and we’ve found that the average number of creative ideas switched to a virtual meeting in a lab study has dropped by about 20%.
Do the results weigh on calls for some quarterly employees to return to the office, whether fulltime or hybrid? “It’s a really interesting question, and it’s also interesting because it has changed through the epidemic. We started working on this project in 2016. Then, of course, the question was, ‘We’re all in person, but is there any work we can do in the long run?’ And when I would talk to managers and people in the industry, and they would always ask me this question.
“Then, after Kovid, the question was, ‘Well, when can we personally justify the work? When can we say it’s important to get people back in the office?’ And I think, in both cases, the answer is that it’s not all or nothing. I think the future of the job is hybrid. Will it be? ‘ Or ‘Should we be distant?’ But what kind of work do we prioritize for each of these?
“So if you’re having a quarterly meeting where everyone is there, then you should focus on being creative. Instead of summarizing what you’ve done, … there’s also the opportunity to come up with new ideas.
“But there are a lot of things that are probably better when you do them remotely. We don’t see any difference in social connections. If anything, we think virtual groups are a little better at selecting ideas. It’s not a conclusion. It’s really more important than that. “
For completely remote groups, or where meeting in person is not possible or practical, does the study indicate what can be done to improve the creation of minimal concepts in a virtual setting?
“We haven’t been able to collect any more data since the covid was infected and that was the plan for further research. So I’m saying this without any empirical evidence – I want to put a caution here that I’m guessing – but based on the results we’ve got, I think Closing the video can help create the idea, as you will no longer be attached to that screen and you will be able to move around your environment consciously.
“I tested it anecdotally with my students. Last year, I taught an innovation class entirely virtually, and when they generate ideas in groups, I told them, try to stop the video. They said it felt too free, they Suddenly it felt like they were free from anything and it helped with their creativity.
“It still needs to be tested, and there is still a lot to be tested in this whole case, because we had a kind of emphasis on working remotely at Covid, and the research is still catching up. So we still need to follow up on that.”
Look at it from a different angle Does the introduction of more immersive technologies, such as virtual or mixed reality, or even larger video screens eliminate some of these barriers to creative collaboration?
“I’ve thought about it a lot. Right now, VR technology is very new. We’re in this avatar state, you can’t see people’s faces, and a big component of why Zoom is so great is the data from how your rich people are responding to you.
“But I think, once VR is able to mimic the real-world environment, the negative effects we’re seeing now will probably go away.
“What’s interesting is, and why I think future research needs to follow our results. The idea that evaluation might be a little better at video conferencing is that once we’re able to fully mimic personal experience, we may not always be. I hope. Research will look at it. Maybe there are times in the future when it will be more effective if we stick to some kind of video technology instead of VR. So I want to see it. More. I think it has to be an interesting aspect.
“In terms of screen size, we’ve actually seen it a bit. Based on our process, we agree that if the screen is large enough, your shared environment has really grown and you no longer feel compelled to look at the screen, it will help. The current market options for screen size may not reach that level, so if you have a really large monitor, it’s a small proportion of your entire environment, within a room.
“So we tried to look at it; we ran a virtual study where we had people create ideas and we captured their screen size. And we saw, ‘Is there a relationship between screen size and human perception generation? Performance?’ We see that there is no significant relationship, but, again, I think it could be because it is still a very narrow part of our environment. And maybe if we could get a screen that was a whole wall or something, it would be different . “
I’m not unfamiliar with Mac. For the past 40 years, I’ve used a Mac, and about five years ago, I moved to my music production platform. But until recently, email, writing, spreadsheets and everything else was done on Windows.
However, thanks to an app, I was finally able to cut through the pride and joy of the Redmond Giants. The Mac is now my daily computer, and it took me almost four decades to get here. And when I look back on my Mac ride, it was a long, weird trip and I thought I’d record it here. My trip started a long time ago, in the age of the original Apple Computer. [queue the time travel effects].
1970: An early bite of an apple
Yes, I said Original Apple Computer, not Apple II, is a fruit-labeled computer that most people imagine having the same experience. This was my first experience with a computer. I still remember entering a dark room and putting an Apple motherboard on a workbench, outputting to an empty CRT. I thought it was one of the best things I’ve ever seen.
The Fairlight CMI (an early music-based computer), the Commodore PET, the IMSAI, the Altair, and even the IBM Punch card were my experiences in those years, but they were not German. That being said, my first Apple experience was long ago.
1980: More affordable option
The beginning of this decade has seen the emergence of new PCs everywhere as every company wanted to enter the growing market, and IBM has not yet mastered the acronym “PC”. The Apple II was one of the most influential machines on the market during this period, although it was hardly the largest player in terms of sales volume.
Yes, Apple II was originally released in 1977. I was selling them and their related software in 1981 when Apple II really gained traction. (I also sold Eagle Computer compatibles!) Also, what most people think of today as the 1980s, really started in the late 70’s. Check it out with Dennis Barnhart.
Since the Apple II / IIe was expensive and much more affordable, although less expandable (Apple II had a card slot!) Or versatile option, I personally never considered it. I moved from the Atari 800 to the Commodore 64, the Atari ST and the Amiga, mostly because they were cheaper, but also because most of them had the same features and in some cases even better. Especially when it comes to gaming – yes, I did indulge once.
Music was my main reason for being involved in computers at first. The real rival of Apple in the music community was the Atari ST, one of the best music computers of all time – for the better ST had a MIDI port. While exchanging my time for software at a local attic store, I made a sale to Robin Williams for his kids. Don’t be naughty.
On the one hand: in a demo of the DEC PDP-1 at the Computer History Museum, Steve Russell, the programmer of the spacewear! This reveals the fact that the first thing programmers did with every computer they created was to “teach” them to play music and chess. My love of music / computer is rarely unique.
When they arrived, Lisa and Macintosh were the future compulsive patrons. However, what would be a recurring theme throughout this narrative, they were not a financially realistic option. I also had a problem with Apple’s behavior – more on that later.
Whatever the feeling, I almost bought a Macintosh to port my Atari / Amiga ear-training program (Take Note). If a similar product was not already available for a platform called Listen, I would. With one small exception, the License was a better program for general education and I reached the programming burnout stage. I’m not stupid. Off, but no cigars.
1990: PC World
My attitude was much the same this decade. Apple had very expensive, very limited apps until the return of Steve Jobs in 1997, and to be honest, it was lazy until Steve Jobs returned in 1997. At one point it seemed as if Apple might be on its way to Dodo. Rarely remember that things were actually horrible for the company. They were.
Mac clones made an impression in 1994, again largely because of the low cost. However, they, like many other products that Apple tried to imitate, lacked certain features. Something. If you are going to leave I don’t know whatYou better save the cash bootload, but the savings were rather light.
I didn’t pay much attention to the Mac until the late decade (1998) when the iMac, iBook, and faster G4 / G5 Mac towers appeared. Jobs and Apple’s Mojo came back, but I was still আবার again, price. Also, many of Apple’s new offers had a certain tiny-bopper flavor that didn’t appeal to me very much.
All this time I was backing up Macs for the PCWorld art department, so I was in good school at Mac OS (soon to be OS X, and now going to be macOS). And yes, PCWorld was published using Mac. In those days, Adobe ruled, and all creatives wanted Mac to run Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator. It was that easy.
2000: Intel, Retina and Core Audio
When Apple switched to Intel, and boot camp was announced, the idea of using a more stylish Mac in dual-boot began to swirl in my head. I’ve been a long time Windows guy now, if not particularly enthusiastic. Then in 2008 the first modern, aluminum IMAX hit the streets and the idea really started to explode.
Apple also understands music / computer romance / relationships of which I have been a part for a long time. The company’s core audio integrates and integrates audio interfaces and MIDI devices. Also tempting is the Logic Pro X, which Apple offers at a ridiculously low price compared to similarly powerful DAWs. Not to mention the garage band, which is free!
Music is a selling point for me and my others, because composing and recording with computer is part of our existence and parcel. If you are not aware, a modern computer can give more results than the best analog gear I have ever recorded. Including in large studios, which themselves have gone digital long ago.
When Shallower-Shell IMAX appeared in 2012 I really started to deal with a bad case of jealousy. I think they are the best-looking computer ever produced. Even colorful new iMacs count. The taste varies. When the retina display appeared, I somehow knew I would own one. But buying a new one from Apple is not easy for an insignificant person like me.
2022: The app that tipped the balance
Although I’ve always loved MacOS, and it’s a more integrated experience, I’ve never liked it more than Windows 7, 8, or 10 (11 much better, more like a Mac) that I’ve still boot-camped. I appreciate the razor-sharp screen font of Windows more than the WYSIWYG fonts of macOS, but other than that, I now find macOS significantly more interesting. I dig really, really cleaner, Rumier designs. But there was still a hurdle to port on my entire daily workflow.
The application that stuck me in my daily Windows Grind was the Microsoft Access (née FoxPro) database, which I use for my invoicing system. Although Microsoft has ported most of their Office suites to Mac OS / OS X / MacOS long ago, Access is a notable exception.
The Mac initially had nothing that matched access and the expensive filemaker didn’t make any appeal to me, even after it was featured. Then I found the ino 35 Ninox. I won’t go into details about it here, but you can read more about it in my review. I switched to it full-time and loved it. I’m even transferring IDG’s storage testing data to it.
Ninox is an app that you can only find once in Windows. This is extremely fast, especially compared to Windows access, which has recently become quite slow. As I wrote in my review, “Import, scrolling, drag and drop, image loading were all very, very fast – as fast as the blink of an eye.” I finally have a database app that is just as good as access, and the ultimate barrier to switching has been removed
The cost of switching
It’s not Apple’s base pricing that bothers me. In fact, Windows PCs with the same components cost the same or more when you consider the exciting high DPI retina displays that come with Thunderbolt and Mac. These displays are not cheap and I have not seen anything like matching in Windows World (USB and HDMI). (Ultrafines similar to LG are not only an effective alternative for Thunderbolt and most Windows users.)
What really bothers my consumer sensitivity is that Apple is charging multiple times how much an upgrade can / should cost. A premium understandable, but two to three times the running rate charge? Automakers will be proud. Then there is the subtle art of setting up strategic features, planned obsolescence and, more recently, the complete lack of upgrades and user repairability.
The company also has a controversial past (its Gem uses digital research cases for Windows OS that used the same XParc technology “inspired by Apple”), labor practices, carpal tunnel one-button mouse calls… I can go. In short, many of us in Apple’s size-conscious Nederland region know this, and it gains the truth. At least buy me a drink first, for good.
That said, I have a lot of respect for the people who design and work on products, as well as products. To switch to ARM, this is absolutely the best thing.
Solve my morally bankrupt money problem? A few years ago I grabbed a used 2015 27-inch Core i5 iMac and a Fusion Drive with 8GB or RAM for a relative song. Then, canceling the warranty and taking the opportunity to break the unit, I personally upgraded it to Core i7-6700, 32GB memory, 2TB NVMe / 4TB SATA SSD unit in which I am writing this article. Total currency: $ 1,400 (I already had an SSD), costing me only $ 200 more than a 5K display.
Thematically, my pet project is as fast as any new Mac. In fact, almost any processor from the last decade will feel fast for everyday work if you connect it to an SSD. Ask any one of the dozens of friends I’ve performed this upgrade for
But I can’t finish the story without repeating the reasons that have skewed my moral compass and brought me under the influence of Apple’s Sovengali. In no particular order, and regardless of importance or repetition:
High DPI retina display
Unparalleled stylish body design
Extremely high quality construction
The macOS has a clean wide appearance and fantastic durability
Core audio installs most music gear
Integrated screen capture (with audio after installing blackhole loopback utility)
Quick network calculation
Being able to annotate PDFs and edit JPGs from within the preview app.
User-defined keyboard shortcuts without third-party software
Easy to install and remove applications
Suitable and free office application
Customizable Finder Toolbar
The only thing that bugs me about MacOS is the lack of support for the multimedia transfer protocol. MTP found in Windows, which allows you to delete files from an Android phone without resorting to third party utilities. This seems to me to be deliberate supervision. Sales of iPhones like Apple really need help.
But I’m enjoying the hack from macOS. It’s all coming out quickly, fantastic for music production, and the iMac shows first-rate on my desk. If my conscience pushes me all at once, well … never say no.
What is the killer app for FPGAs? For some, Mohan is the ultra-high data throughput for parallel tasks, which can enable some pretty messy projects. But what if you just started? What about 1980s style video games?
Mr. FPGA project has created some FPGA hardware that basically makes it easy to build. Any Old school video games or computer platforms. That’s a massive clean slate. Of course, you can download and load someone else’s Atari ST or Commodore 64 setup, but if you want To learn When rebuilding FPGs old-school video game machines, you want to get your hands dirty.
[Mister Retro Wolf] Last winter he started a video series (embedded trailer below) where he started a project to recreate a classic video game machine from the ground up using the MiSter FPGA platform. In particular, he is going to recreate the Namco Tank Battalion arcade game from Verilge Schematics.
It is literally building a 6502-based video game machine from scratch (Gateware), so if you’re interested in retrocomputing Or FPGAs, you have something to learn here. It has been acquired through CPU, screen, tilemap graphics and memory so far, but it has not been done yet. To follow, get yourself some hardware and you can probably catch up.
We’ve covered the MiSter FPGA project before, of course, because we think it’s great. And if a video game arcade machine is going to be your gateway drug into the seeded world of programmable gates, so be it.
It took eight years, but Apple finally completed the transition to replace iCloud documents and data services with iCloud Drive. What’s happening, why Apple did it, what it means for your business, and what you should do now?
What should you do now?
Most iCloud users will notice that Apple has already moved their content to iCloud Drive. It is easy to use and provides a much more elegant user experience.
There are some users, who originally had an iCloud account before iCloud Drive launched in 2014, who have not yet enabled the new online storage service. This can be a particular problem for users who want to run pre-iOS 8 devices and Macs on older operating systems, as they do not support iCloud Drive.
That shouldn’t represent a large number of users, so eight years after the former release and nine years since the last non-compatible Mac OS was shipped, Apple clearly thinks it’s right to disable such access – as it warned last year.
If you use iCloud documents and data on a system that supports the new online storage system, you need to enable iCloud Drive to view your files in iCloud.
See below for relevant instructions.
What exactly is happening in iCloud documents and data?
Apple’s iCloud Documents and Data goal is to sync data from different apps so that it is available on all your devices. Apple shut down documents and data this month, transferring all data stored on it to iCloud Drive. The company announced plans to do so in May 2021.
Why has Apple changed this iCloud?
The big advantage of this step is that users get a much more integrated experience with iCloud Drive across all devices using Finder integration for files on iOS / iPadOS and iCloud Drive on Macs.
Previous implementations were not always immediately apparent. The file location and management experience is much better, as it is both clear and understandable.
Together with other recent changes to iCloud, reflected by the new iterations of OneDrive, Dropbox and Box, all of which require different APIs, these steps could signal a fundamental change as the company seeks to develop its services.
That’s what Apple said
In a statement last year, Apple explained its plans:
“In May 2022, iCloud Documents and Data Services, our former document synchronization service, will be discontinued and will be completely replaced by iCloud Drive. Therefore, if you use iCloud documents and data, your account will be transferred to iCloud Drive after that date.
“If you use iCloud Documents and Data Services, you must activate iCloud Drive by following the steps below to view your files. Upgrading to iCloud Drive does not change the storage space used by the files stored on your iCloud. “
Apple now tells users:
“If you use iCloud documents and data services, you need to turn on iCloud Drive to view your files. When you switch to iCloud Drive, the amount of storage space your saved files use in iCloud does not change. “
Why it (maybe) matters to your business
Available for every user (a little) 5GB of free storage, additional iCloud storage is available on a subscription basis and in both Apple One and Apple Business Essentials. This means that if you install or support Apple devices and hardware, most likely you or your employees are already using the service.
If you use Apple Business Manager and any type of MDM solution, you may already have some sort of data segmentation to separate personal to enterprise data, including access to both your employees’ business and personal iCloud storage accounts.
In the latter case, and of course for anyone using Mac, iPhone, or iPad around 2018 or later, most people will already be using iCloud Drive instead of Apple’s legacy service. However, it is possible that some of your users may be stuck with legacy services, which means you should now help ensure that your data is protected with the latest conversions.
Of course, Apple’s move to integrate the iCloud service is understandable because the company clearly plans to make big improvements as it lays out additional services to support the iCloud + service.
Why you should always backup iCloud
As useful as iCloud Drive is, an essential element of data management is to ensure that important documents are not only stored on iCloud Drive but also backed up locally using the Enterprise Backup service of your choice.
It is also a good practice to encourage staff to check backups from time to time to make sure all relevant data is stored there. Apple has an excellent online article to help you create an archiving system.
What is the difference between the two?
Apart from working with real file and folder systems like Dropbox, Box, or OneDrive, Document Collaboration, etc., the biggest difference between iCloud Drive and iCloud Documents and Data was the limitations of the latter.
Although it syncs data to documents and data systems, it only allows access to data from the relevant application. Data on iCloud Drive can be accessed from any compatible app. ICloud Drive lets you access your data from files on Apple mobile devices, iCloud Drive on Mac Finder, via iCloud.com, and even other devices equipped with Windows or iCloud Drive support.
How to enable iCloud Drive
To enable iCloud Drive on an iPhone or iPad running iOS 8 or later:
Open Settings> Username.
Select iCloud and toggle Enable cloud drive On
You will now find your data in the File app.
To enable iCloud Drive on Macs running Catalina or later:
Open System Preferences> Apple ID.
Select iCloud and toggle Enable cloud drive On
You will find your files in the iCloud section of your Finder.
Learn more about iCloud
We have plenty of iCloud resources to help you get the most out of your system
Interested in learning more about iCloud? Please let us know and we will explore the matter.
Follow me TwitterOr join me in AppleHolic’s bar & grill and Apple discussion group on MeWe.
If you’re wondering how to fit a fitness tracker into a ring, well, you’re not alone. [Becky Stern] CT sent someone to scan, went into it with a rotating tool, and then he made a video about it. [David Cranor]. (Video is embedded below.)
While it’s great that you can tear down something these days without tearing it down – thanks to CT scans – most of the analysis is done in a cut-up version of the thing through a simple stereo microscope. Still, the ability to flip the thing over in a 3D CT scan is excellent.
We totally agree [Becky] And [David] It’s amazing how much was fitted in very few places. Somewhere along the way, [David] The electrical, mechanical and software design teams have certainly worked hard together to close this project and it shows. After all, there’s a nice running dialogue about how you know what you’re looking at when tearing up a new device, and it’s good to look at their shoulders.
Then where are the bits [Becky] A lithium-ion battery pack shows you what it looks like when cut in half. He said it was already mostly leaking and he did not explode in the fire. But get there easily! (Also, make sure you take your hot xylene outdoors.)
X-ray machines are definitely the greatest thing when doing a teardown. We’ve seen them use everything from fixing multimeters to servo motors.
The other day, my dad – while passing my bellows for technology – mentioned that he had read online that Windows 11 should not be used and that the operating system was not being adopted.
Dad had a word. He is now an Apple user – I put him on my phone plan to support his technical needs, he uses an iPhone and has an iPad. As its needs have changed, so has its reliance on Windows devices. In fact, his current Windows needs include applications that are not on the Apple platform. (And since he is a standalone user, not a domain user, much of Windows 11’s progress will not be available to him with authentication.)
“ComputerWorld” recently noted that Windows 11’s UpTech is running slowly, running at only 1.44% of all systems. This is similar to what I see at home and in my office. At home I have a single computer, a Surface Pro 7 that can run Windows 11 In the office, I only have two computers that support Windows 11
In fact many users Can’t Run Windows 11. If you are, and are interested in why you can’t run Windows 11, you can download the ByteJins tool to find out exactly why. For example, the laptop I use has a trusted platform module that will support Windows 11. But its processor does not support Virtualization based security (VBS)
Windows 11 confirms that VBS is enabled by default to support hypervisor-enforced code integrity. While you may argue that this protection may not be required on a standalone workstation, the enterprise will want to make sure that it is enabled. (This is not a new technology, but the order is new.)
Windows Defender Credential Guard requires VBS, which protects domain certificates over a network. As mentioned: “Credential Guard is a virtualization-based isolation technology for LSASS that prevents attackers from stealing credentials that can be used to pass a hash attack. আপ After compromising with a system, attackers often try to extract any stored credentials for further lateral movement through the network. A major goal is the LSASS process, which stores NTLM and Kerberos certificates. Credential Guard prevents attackers from dumping certificates stored in LSASS by running LSASS in a virtualized container that even a user with system privileges cannot access. The system then creates a proxy mechanism called LSAIso (LSA Isolated) to communicate with the virtualized LSASS process.
Although it already works on Windows 10, Windows 11 builds on this protection. Sounds great for business, doesn’t it? But there is a problem: many users are not properly licensed to improve the security of Windows 11. The key is Windows Defender Credential Guard – you need an enterprise license to use it. So while it provides a lot of protection for your user or login privacy, it is not available to many users. In future versions of Windows 11, Credential Guard will be enabled by default, but again, only for enterprise customers.
Another new technology I’m excited about is smart application control, although I have some concerns about it. Smart app control, as Microsoft explains, “prevents users from running malicious applications on Windows devices that block the default, unsigned or unsigned applications. In addition to using code signing, our new Smart App Controls allow only processes that are predicted to be secure based on an AI model for either a code certificate or an application trust in Microsoft Cloud.
“Model estimates 24 hours latest threat occurs on intelligence which provides trillion signals. When running a new application in Windows 11, only known secure applications are allowed to run. Check its signature and key features against this model. This means that Windows 11 users can be confident that they are using only secure and reliable applications on their new Windows device. Smart app control will be sent to the new device with Windows 11 installed on it. You need to have a clean installation of Windows 11 to get it. “
I still regularly install software that is unsigned. So I already know that smart application control won’t work for me in the office or at home because I can’t run the software using a “whitelist” method. I’m not even sure what licensing will be required. Will it be available to everyone? Will it be an enterprise-only feature?
Bottom line: Windows 11 will be great for enterprises if you have the right license to take advantage of these features. But I’m not sure it gives you a great advantage at home. If you’re worried that your old hardware won’t run Windows 11, don’t do it. Windows 11 is the next version of Windows and doesn’t really bring much security to the average user. That’s why my dad will continue to use Windows 10 for now and don’t worry about Windows 11.